‘Jesus’, Of Course, Wasn’t White. He Was A Man Of Color, Probably Not As Colorful As Me. But, NOT White.

2 Replies

by Anura Guruge
on March 31, 2024

Click to ENLARGE. To access the ‘CNN’ post.

White ‘Jesus‘ was the creation of Italian, renaissance artist who were mainly familiar with white skinned folk.

Jesus was extremely unlikely to have been white.

A British term, which was often used to describe me, best characterizes Jesus. WOG. (Yes, golliwog comes from it.) WOG = a person from the Middle East.

Jesus was NOT black either. He was NOT from Africa. He was a Wog.

Tanned. A brown tint. Probably a few shades lighter than I, but definitely yet, a man of color.

I had known that most of my life. Jesus looked more like me than he looks like Trump. Period. Definitely not orange.

And he did NOT speak English, or for that matter Greek or Latin. Period.

2 thoughts on “‘Jesus’, Of Course, Wasn’t White. He Was A Man Of Color, Probably Not As Colorful As Me. But, NOT White.”

    1. admin Post author

      YOU & your FAKE NEWS & INFO. But, again, I NOW understand & appreciate. You CAN’T HELP being a LITERALIST. You are like the original AI ‘Liza’. You parrot things WITHOUT applying any discernment or processing.
      So, as with the antipopes you read this definition in Wikipedia. It is right there … word for word: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wog
      ****
      But, YOU didn’t pick up the “are perhaps examples of false etymology or backronyms” part. Yes, YOU can’t help it. Face it.
      *****
      My definition, which I mentioned, re. golliwogs is closer to the mark.
      *****
      IF you could DISCERN you would APPRECIATE that ‘gentleman’ is NOT applicable with this term. JESUS. Jesus wept.
      <><><>
      You really LOVE to waste other people’s time because ….
      Oh, dear. Oh, dear.

      Reply ↓

Leave a Reply